Imperial Preference (1933)

This document is extracted from the Report of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce for the year 1933. In regard of manufacturing industries in Hong Kong, the Chamber of Commerce had surveyed the industries in Hong Kong qualified for Imperial Preference in respect of costs in processing and work done in Hong Kong while the raw materials were imported from China. Industrial products that were not exported to the United Kingdom did not have encountered problems on meeting Imperial Preference requirements.

Date 1933
Industry ginger and preserves | soy | sugar | knitting | rattan | furniture | seagrass | rubber shoe | lard |torch | battery | feather | firecracker
Related Keywords United Kingdom|British|colony|dominion|territory|manufacturing|empire product|duty exemption|Imperial Preference
Material Type Print
Collection Pre-war Industry
Source Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. 1933. Report, pp.22-28. Hong Kong: Noronha & Co.; Printed by the South China Morning Post.
Repository The University of Hong Kong Libraries
Note to Copyright Permission for use is given by The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce
Accession No. WL-IMP-006b
Share Share
Other Documents
  • Guide to the Chinese Manufacturers' products of Hong Kong
    The book has 4 sections. Section 1 is reviews on different Hong Kong industries. Section 2 is an inventory of Chinese manufacturers. It provides factory name, address, history of foundation, capital, import of materials, export of products, manufactures, trademarks, volume of sales, employment conditions and factory premises. Each factory report is accompanied with pictures or sketches of its products and trademarks. The manufactories are classified into 11 industries and 33 sub-divisions. Section 3 has 3 graphs showing (1) the number of factories opened in each year from 1906 to 1934; (2) the proportions of factories by industry type; (3) size of capital investment by industry type. An index of directory of Chinese manufacturers is attached. Section 4 is the annual report of the Hong Kong Chinese Manufacturers' Association.
  • Textile Quotas Legislation (1937)
    This document is extracted from the Report of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce for the year 1937. Since 1937, it was a rule that Hong Kong textile manufacturers had to prove their textile goods be spun, woven and finished within the British Empire in order to exempt from the quota restrictions on exporting the goods to the British Empire markets.
  • Empire Quota for Textiles and Rayon Goods (1934)
    This document is extracted from the Report of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce for the year 1934. The Board of Trade in London suggested to the governments of all colonies and protectorates to introduce a system of quotas in order to protect British traders against competition of Japanese manufactured goods. The Chamber of Commerce reported its argument against this suggestion.
  • Quantities and Values of Principal Articles of Exports During the Years 1937 and 1938
    The report is extracted from the administrative report of "Commerce" for the year 1938. It recorded the exports from Hong Kong of both Chinese commodities and Hong Kong manufactured goods. Two tables were provided: (1) A table showing the value of the export of Hong Kong made goods in 1938; (2) Appendix C showing the percentage of total exports sent to the British Empire markets and foreign countries.
  • Percentage of Total Exports sent to Empire and Foreign Countries (1939)
    The report was extracted from the administrative report of "Commerce" for the year 1939. It recorded the exports from Hong Kong of both Chinese commodities and Hong Kong manufactured goods. Two tables were provided: (1) A table showing the value of the export of Hong Kong made goods in 1939; (2) Appendix C showing the percentage of total exports sent to the British Empire markets and foreign countries.